Delivery SLA definition and monitoring
Every delivery SLA we write for groups in Bahrain, the UAE, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Oman and Kuwait has a clock, a tolerance and a price, and you can measure each one from your own task records.
What we do
We write each service level that governs your delivery, whether it runs on your own fleet, a partner or both. Each one carries a precise start and stop for the clock, a tolerance, an exclusion list, a financial consequence and a source of evidence.
Then we run the monthly monitoring that shows whether each level was met.
What you get
- A service-level catalogue defining each promise, its clock start, its clock stop and its tolerance.
- A measurement specification naming the system, field and timestamp that evidences each level.
- A credit and consequence schedule, set in proportion to the cost of a miss.
- A monthly service report to the group's standard, one page for the board and one for operations.
- An escalation ladder from the first miss to a formal review.
What changes
- Your board reads the share of deliveries inside the promised window on one agreed clock.
- Disputes with partners are counted per thousand deliveries, which shows whether the definitions hold.
- Service credits claimed sit beside the credits due, so money owed to the group is visible.
- Every service-level dispute carries a closing date.
- Your report and each partner's report show the same figure.
The problem we solve
Delivery promises are often loose: same day, within the hour, on time. When the partner and the group measure from different clocks, every missed delivery becomes an argument, and the group cannot claim credits or show customers what it actually delivers.
Signs you need it
- Your report of on-time delivery and the partner's report differ.
- The contract says delivery within a day and does not say whose day.
- Service credits exist in the agreement and have never been claimed.
- A merchant disputes your stated delivery times and you cannot settle it from records.
- Customers receive a promised window that the network sometimes cannot meet.
Who it is for
Commercial and operations leaders who buy delivery from partners, delivery businesses that promise time windows to merchants, and 3PL and courier operators negotiating service levels with large customers.
Why At Par
Qasim Abbas has spent more than 16 years inside Gulf family-based and venture-backed groups, and he holds one rule for service levels: both parties read the same number from the same data. We write and monitor your service levels to that rule.
How we work
We measure from your dispatch records, partner portals and the delivery proof captured in your platform, and the monthly report sits with the performance dashboards. See how fees work.
Questions boards ask
- Should credits be large enough to hurt?
- They should be proportionate to the cost of a miss. Credits too small to matter are ignored and credits too high are negotiated away.
- Can we hold our own fleet to a service level?
- Yes, and it is good practice. Internal service levels show the true cost of the promise and give your partners a fair comparison.
The next step
Open the briefing with your current delivery agreement and last month's on-time figure. We tell you whether the clock behind that figure holds up in a dispute.
Related
- Outsourced delivery-provider managementA managed portfolio of delivery partners with rate cards, scorecards, invoice checks and credible alternatives.
- Failed-delivery reductionA cause-by-cost analysis of failed deliveries, with checks before dispatch and a retry and returns policy.
- Last-mile performance dashboardsDaily, weekly and board dashboards for the network, built on one set of metric definitions tied to the ledger.
Bring last month. Leave with a score.
Sit down with Qasim Abbas. One table, your numbers, and a clear read on where you stand against par.